BURNEY, CARMEN C., PEOPLE v ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    357
    KA 11-00398
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    CARMEN C. BURNEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    JAMES L. DOWSEY, III, ELLICOTTVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM
    OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M.
    Himelein, J.), rendered January 31, 2011. The judgment convicted
    defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the second
    degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her
    upon her plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree
    (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s
    contention, the record shows that she entered a valid waiver of
    indictment, and freely and voluntarily consented to be prosecuted by
    way of a superior court information (see CPL 195.10, 195.20; see
    generally People v Davis, 84 AD3d 1645, 1646, lv denied 17 NY3d 815;
    People v McKenzie, 51 AD3d 823). Although the contention of defendant
    that her guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently
    entered survives her waiver of the right to appeal, defendant did not
    move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and
    thus failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v
    Russell, 55 AD3d 1314, 1314-1315, lv denied 11 NY3d 930; People v
    Harrison, 4 AD3d 825, lv denied 2 NY3d 740). Defendant’s further
    contention that she was denied effective assistance of counsel does
    not survive either the plea of guilty or the waiver by defendant of
    the right to appeal because she failed to demonstrate that “the plea
    bargaining process was infected by [the] allegedly ineffective
    assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of [her]
    attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance” (People v Robinson, 39 AD3d
    1266, 1267, lv denied 9 NY3d 869 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
    Entered:    March 23, 2012                         Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 11-00398

Filed Date: 3/23/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016