ROWE, WENDI v. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •         SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1455
    TP 11-01317
    PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
    IN THE MATTER OF WENDI ROWE AND DOUGLAS GROOMS,
    PETITIONERS,
    V                             MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY
    SERVICES AND CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
    SOCIAL SERVICES, RESPONDENTS.
    ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (PAUL V. WEBB, III, OF
    COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS.
    JULIE B. HEWITT, MAYVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT
    OF SOCIAL SERVICES.
    ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (JULIE M. SHERIDAN OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY
    SERVICES.
    Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the
    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial
    Department by order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County [James H.
    Dillon, J.], entered August 4, 2010) to review a determination of
    respondent New York State Office of Children and Family Services. The
    determination denied petitioners’ request that reports maintained in
    the New York State Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment,
    indicating petitioners for maltreatment, be amended to unfounded and
    sealed.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously
    confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
    Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this CPLR article 78
    proceeding seeking to annul the determination of respondent New York
    State Office of Children and Family Services denying their request to
    amend an indicated report of maltreatment to provide instead that the
    report was unfounded (see Social Services Law § 422 [8] [a] [v]; [c]
    [ii]). “Upon our review of the record, we conclude that there is a
    rational basis for the agency’s determination and that it is supported
    by substantial evidence” (Matter of Draman v New York State Off. of
    Children & Family Servs., 78 AD3d 1603, 1603-1604; see Matter of
    -2-                 1455
    TP 11-01317
    Theresa G. v Johnson, 26 AD3d 726).
    Entered:   December 30, 2011           Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: TP 11-01317

Filed Date: 12/30/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016