MCCULLOUGH, DAVID v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    285
    KAH 10-00654
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL.
    DAVID MCCULLOUGH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
    V                            MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE,
    RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
    D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR
    PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
    ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL),
    FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the
    Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), entered February
    19, 2010 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the
    petition.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed without costs.
    Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ
    of habeas corpus on the ground that he allegedly did not receive
    timely notice of the final parole revocation hearing pursuant to
    Executive Law § 259-i (3) (f) (iii), nor did he receive effective
    assistance of counsel at the final hearing. We conclude that Supreme
    Court properly denied the petition. First, the record establishes
    that petitioner waived any issues concerning the allegedly untimely
    notice of the final parole revocation hearing at the time of that
    hearing (see People ex rel. Webster v Travis, 277 AD2d 546; People ex
    rel. Medina v Superintendent, 101 AD2d 871). Second, habeas corpus
    relief is not available based on petitioner’s alleged denial of
    effective assistance of counsel at the final parole revocation hearing
    because he would not be entitled to immediate release from
    incarceration on that ground (see People ex rel. Shannon v Khahaifa,
    74 AD3d 1867, lv dismissed 15 NY3d 868). We note that, although this
    Court has the power to convert this proceeding into one pursuant to
    CPLR article 78, we deem such conversion to be inappropriate on the
    record before us (see id. at 1867-1868).
    Entered:   March 25, 2011                       Patricia L. Morgan
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KAH 10-00654

Filed Date: 3/25/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016