Bank of America, N.A. v. Meade , 153 A.D.3d 776 ( 2017 )

Bank of Am., N.A. v Meade (2017 NY Slip Op 06246)

Bank of Am., N.A. v Meade

2017 NY Slip Op 06246

Decided on August 23, 2017

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 23, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
L. PRISCILLA HALL
JEFFREY A. COHEN
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2015-04236
(Index No. 705042/13)

[*1]Bank of America, N.A., respondent,

v

Warren Meade, appellant, et al., defendants.

Warren Meade, Saint Albans, NY, appellant pro se.

Shapiro, DiCaro & Barak, LLC, Rochester, NY (Ellis M. Oster and Jason P. Dionisio of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Warren Meade appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy, J.), dated October 7, 2014, which denied his motion to strike or mark off the court's calendar the plaintiff's motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the complaint.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appellant has abandoned his appeal from the order appealed from by not making any arguments relating to that order in his brief (see Castle Restoration & Constr., Inc. v Castle Restoration, LLC, 149 AD3d 692, 693; Matter of Miedema v Miedema, 144 AD3d 803, 803-804). Moreover, the appellant has not assembled a proper record on appeal, as the record does not contain the motion papers and exhibits that were before the Supreme Court (see CPLR 5526; Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Hounnou, 147 AD3d 814, 814-815; Ghatani v AGH Realty, LLC, 136 AD3d 744). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.

The appellant's remaining contentions are not properly before us on this appeal.

MASTRO, J.P., HALL, COHEN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court