Weinstein v. City of New York , 174 A.D. 922 ( 1916 )

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the ruling of the trial court at folios 367 and 368 was erroneous to the manifest and substantial prejudice of the plaintiff. (See Furst v. Second Avenue Railroad Co., 72 N. Y. 542.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented.