Matter of Mitchell v. Ambro , 148 A.D.3d 810 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Matter of Mitchell v Ambro (2017 NY Slip Op 01696)
    Matter of Mitchell v Ambro
    2017 NY Slip Op 01696
    Decided on March 8, 2017
    Appellate Division, Second Department
    Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
    This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


    Decided on March 8, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
    LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
    ROBERT J. MILLER
    HECTOR D. LASALLE
    JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

    2016-12993 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

    [*1]In the Matter of William Mitchell, petitioner,

    v

    Richard M. Ambro, etc., et al., respondents.




    William Mitchell, Patchogue, NY, petitioner pro se.

    Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for respondent Richard M. Ambro.

    Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Guy Arcidiacono pro se of counsel), respondent pro se.



    Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, in effect, to compel the respondent Richard M. Ambro, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, inter alia, to grant the petitioner's motion to vacate a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 23, 2001, and to dismiss the indictment in the underlying criminal action, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

    ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

    ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

    The extraordinary relief of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Soc. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

    AUSTIN, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and COHEN, JJ., concur.

    ENTER:

    Aprilanne Agostino

    Clerk of the Court



Document Info

Docket Number: 2016-12993

Citation Numbers: 2017 NY Slip Op 1696, 148 A.D.3d 810, 47 N.Y.S.3d 912

Judges: Austin, Miller, Lasalle, Cohen

Filed Date: 3/8/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024