Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity ( 1928 )


Menu:
  • Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, *759being of opinion that there was no stress of circumstances that distinguishes the ease from Rohrbacher v. Gillig (203 N. Y. 413).

Document Info

Filed Date: 12/15/1928

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2024