Reilly v. Connable ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • As the record on this trial differs in no substantial way from that on the former trial (See 156 App. Div. 920), the law of this case must be applied as it was on the former appeal (214 N. Y. 586), and the judgment and order are reversed, and the complaint is unanimously dismissed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/15/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2024