Matter of Buono v. DiNapoli , 41 N.Y.S.3d 774 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           State of New York
    Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    Third Judicial Department
    Decided and Entered: November 17, 2016                   523087
    ________________________________
    In the Matter of MARK J. BUONO
    SR.,
    Petitioner,
    v                                     MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
    THOMAS P. DiNAPOLI, as State
    Comptroller,
    Respondent.
    ________________________________
    Calendar Date:   October 21, 2016
    Before:   McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Clark and Aarons, JJ.
    __________
    Bartlett, McDonough & Monaghan, LLP, White Plains (Ryan K.
    Allen of counsel), for petitioner.
    Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E.
    Storrs of counsel), for respondent.
    __________
    Aarons, J.
    Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this
    Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to
    review a determination of respondent denying petitioner's
    application for accidental disability retirement benefits.
    Petitioner worked as a police officer for 15 years. On
    April 19, 2012, he was placing a suspect, who had been
    handcuffed, into the rear seat of the patrol vehicle when the
    suspect pulled away causing petitioner to be drawn toward the
    vehicle, to strike his neck and right shoulder on the door jamb,
    and to sustain injury. As a result of this incident, he filed an
    application for accidental disability retirement benefits. The
    -2-                523087
    application was denied by the New York State and Local Police and
    Fire Retirement System on the ground that the incident did not
    constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and
    Social Security Law § 363. Petitioner requested a hearing and,
    at its conclusion, the Hearing Officer denied the application for
    the same reason. Respondent adopted the Hearing Officer's
    decision and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
    We confirm. It is well settled that an accident, for
    purposes of the Retirement and Social Security Law, is "a sudden,
    fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and
    injurious in impact" (Matter of Kenny v DiNapoli, 11 NY3d 873,
    874 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see
    Matter of Beckley v Nitido, 123 AD3d 1330, 1331 [2014]). The
    party seeking benefits bears the burden of establishing that the
    injury-producing event was accidental (see Matter of Lamb v
    DiNapoli, 139 AD3d 1312, 1313 [2016]; Matter of Scofield v
    DiNapoli, 125 AD3d 1086, 1087 [2015]). Significantly, "[i]n
    order to be deemed accidental, an injury must not have been 'the
    result of activities undertaken in the ordinary course of one's
    job duties' but, rather, 'must be due to a precipitating
    accidental event which is not a risk of the work performed'"
    (Matter of Schoales v DiNapoli, 132 AD3d 1184, 1185 [2015],
    quoting Matter of Pommerville v McCall, 6 AD3d 1025, 1026 [2004];
    see Matter of Lamb v DiNapoli, 139 AD3d at 1313).
    Here, petitioner was performing a routine duty of his job
    when he responded to his fellow officer's request for assistance
    in placing the suspect, for whom there was a warrant outstanding,
    under arrest. He had a hold of the suspect and was in the
    process of guiding him into the back seat of the patrol vehicle,
    an activity that he had performed before and for which he had a
    specific protocol, when the suspect pulled away. Although
    petitioner did not anticipate this movement by the suspect, this
    does not render the incident accidental. Considering that the
    suspect had violently resisted arrest and was clearly agitated,
    it could be reasonably expected that he would not be cooperative
    in getting into the vehicle. Accordingly, inasmuch as
    petitioner's injury arose from an inherent risk of his job,
    substantial evidence supports the determination denying his
    application for accidental disability retirement benefits (see
    -3-                  523087
    e.g. Matter of Beckley v Nitido, 123 AD3d at 1331; Matter of
    Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013]; Matter of Hunce
    v DiNapoli, 106 AD3d 1427, 1428-1429 [2013]).
    McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
    ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without
    costs, and petition dismissed.
    ENTER:
    Robert D. Mayberger
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 523087

Citation Numbers: 144 A.D.3d 1386, 41 N.Y.S.3d 774

Judges: Aarons, McCarthy, Egan, Lynch, Clark

Filed Date: 11/17/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2024