Milkman v. Casesa , 175 A.D. 904 ( 1916 )

—Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, without prejudice to the respondent to renew said motion on additional affidavits setting forth facts and circumstances sufficient to indicate that the plaintiff has a good cause of action on the merits. (See Heischober v. Polishook,, 158 App. Div. 193; Rothschild v. Haviland, 178 id. 562.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.