In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n in Respect of Scheinick ( 1931 )

The attitude of the complainant indicates the truthfulness of respondent’s stofy with reference to the transaction between them. The attorney expresses regret for his inattention to the communication of the bar association. The charges are dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Carswell and Davis, JJ., dissent and vote to refer the matter to an official referee.