JOHNSON, ANDREW J., PEOPLE v ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •         SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1264
    KA 14-00036
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                                MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    ANDREW J. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF
    COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (LAURA T. BITTNER OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S.
    Farkas, J.), rendered September 5, 2013. The judgment convicted
    defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously modified on the law by vacating the sentence and as
    modified the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to
    Niagara County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the
    following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting
    him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law
    § 140.20). Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence
    is unduly harsh and severe, and that contention is encompassed by
    defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6
    NY3d 248, 256). We note, however, that the proper sentencing
    procedures pursuant to CPL 400.21 were not followed and thus that the
    sentence may be illegal. County Court sentenced defendant as a first
    felony offender, but, “ ‘[w]hen it became apparent at sentencing that
    defendant had a prior felony conviction, the People were required to
    file a second felony offender statement in accordance with CPL 400.21
    and, if appropriate, the court was then required to sentence defendant
    as a second felony offender’ ” (People v Stubbs, 96 AD3d 1448, 1450,
    lv denied 19 NY3d 1001). “[I]t is illegal to sentence a known
    predicate felon as a first offender” (id. [internal quotation marks
    omitted]) and, inasmuch as we cannot allow an illegal sentence to
    stand, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed and we
    remit the matter to County Court for the filing of a predicate felony
    offender statement and resentencing in accordance with the law (see
    id.).
    Entered: January 2, 2015                           Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 14-00036

Filed Date: 1/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/2/2015