Matter of Brinster v. Sklar , 37 N.Y.S.3d 906 ( 2016 )

Matter of Brinster v Sklar (2016 NY Slip Op 06210)

Matter of Brinster v Sklar

2016 NY Slip Op 06210

Decided on September 28, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 28, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2015-00330
(Docket No. V-10967-06)

[*1]In the Matter of Christopher Brinster, appellant,

v

Tami D. Sklar, respondent.

Gail Jacobs, Great Neck, NY, for appellant.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the father from a corrected order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Elaine Jackson Stack, J.H.O.), dated December 23, 2014. The corrected order dismissed the father's petition alleging a violation of an order of visitation. The father's assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the corrected order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738). Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court