Claim of De Lorme v. General Ice Cream Corp. ( 1929 )

Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the rulings of the referee amounted to arbitrary conduct prejudicial to a fair disclosure of competent facts relevant to the question of dependency, and that the proof of dependency was insufficient. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.