McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Co. , 190 A.D. 928 ( 1919 )

Upon reargument, judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Foote and De Angelis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal and granting a new trial, upon the ground that defendant’s exceptions to the charge of the court and its refusal to charge as requested, were well taken. [See 188 App. Div. 997; 189 id. 923.]