Lane v. Sochacki , 107 N.Y.S.2d 556 ( 1951 )

Ho opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with the following memorandum: The papers fail to include competent or sufficient evidence to warrant granting the application or to excuse the delay in making it. (See Kenney v. South Shore Natural Gas & Fuel Co., 126 App. Div. 236.)