Hartman v. Hartman , 107 N.Y.S.2d 459 ( 1951 )

Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.