KEITZ, MICHAEL J., PEOPLE v ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1027
    KA 11-00807
    PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    MICHAEL J. KEITZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    PETER O. EINSET, GENEVA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (JASON A. MACBRIDE
    OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F.
    Kocher, J.), rendered January 5, 2011. The judgment convicted
    defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him
    upon his guilty plea of assault in the second degree (Penal Law §
    120.05 [7]). Defendant contends that he did not plead guilty or admit
    guilt and thus that he was not convicted of the charge brought against
    him. At the start of the plea proceeding, defendant agreed that he
    would plead guilty to assault in the second degree. He indicated that
    he was pleading guilty of his own free will and after having had
    sufficient time to discuss it with his attorney. When County Court
    asked defendant “[h]ow do you plead,” defendant responded “[y]es.”
    Thereafter, the court asked defendant specific questions about the
    charge, and defendant made various admissions. We conclude that the
    plea allocution as a whole establishes that “defendant understood the
    charges and made an intelligent decision to enter a plea” (People v
    Goldstein, 12 NY3d 295, 301).
    To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied
    effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v
    Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316, 1316, lv denied 6 NY3d 752), we conclude that
    it lacks merit. Defendant “receive[d] an advantageous plea and
    nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of
    counsel” (People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).
    Entered:    October 5, 2012                        Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 11-00807

Filed Date: 10/5/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016