L., JASON, PEOPLE v , 921 N.Y.S.2d 603 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •         SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    553
    KA 10-01492
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT,
    V                             MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    JASON L., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    THOMAS E. MORAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (VICTOR D. ROWCLIFFE OF
    COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT.
    THE PARRINELLO LAW FIRM, LLP, ROCHESTER (BRUCE F. FREEMAN OF COUNSEL),
    FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from an adjudication of the Livingston County Court
    (Robert B. Wiggins, J.), rendered April 13, 2010. Defendant was
    adjudicated a youthful offender upon his plea of guilty to burglary in
    the first degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.
    Memorandum: The People purport to appeal from a sentence
    imposing a term of incarceration upon defendant’s plea of guilty of
    burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2]), after County
    Court found that defendant was a youthful offender. The People
    contend that the court abused its discretion in granting defendant
    youthful offender status and that, as a result, the sentence imposed
    is invalid as a matter of law. We conclude that the appeal must be
    dismissed. “CPL 450.30 (2) authorizes the People to appeal from a
    sentence that is invalid as a matter of law” (People v Cosme, 80 NY2d
    790, 792), but that statute does not authorize the People to appeal
    from a youthful offender finding (see generally People v Calderon, 79
    NY2d 61, 63-64, 67). Indeed, upon finding that an individual is a
    youthful offender, “the court must direct that the conviction be
    deemed vacated and replaced by a youthful offender finding[,] and the
    court must sentence the defendant pursuant to section 60.02 of the
    penal law” (CPL 720.20 [3] [emphasis added]). “[T]he youthful
    offender finding and the youthful offender sentence imposed thereupon
    constitute a ‘youthful offender adjudication’ ” (Calderon, 79 NY2d at
    65). Here, the People do not allege that the sentence of
    incarceration of 1a to 4 years is illegal. Rather, “in the guise of
    challenging the sentence imposed, the People are in essence attacking
    the validity of the defendant’s underlying [youthful offender
    finding,] . . . [which CPL 450.30 (2)] does not permit them to do”
    -2-                  553
    KA 10-01492
    (Cosme, 80 NY2d at 792).
    Entered:   April 29, 2011         Patricia L. Morgan
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 10-01492

Citation Numbers: 83 A.D.3d 1560, 921 N.Y.S.2d 603

Filed Date: 4/29/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024