Matter of Williams ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           State of New York
    Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    Third Judicial Department
    Decided and Entered: April 21, 2016                    D-26-16
    ___________________________________
    In the Matter of DERRICK R.
    WILLIAMS SR., a Suspended
    Attorney.
    COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL                   MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    STANDARDS,
    Petitioner;
    DERRICK R. WILLIAMS SR.,
    Respondent.
    (Attorney Registration No. 3064094)
    ___________________________________
    Calendar Date:   March 28, 2016
    Before:   Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.
    __________
    Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,
    Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner.
    Derrick R. Williams Sr., St. Ann, Missouri, respondent
    pro se.
    __________
    Per Curiam.
    Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2000.
    In 2001, respondent was admitted to practice in Missouri, where
    he currently resides.
    By order entered June 19, 2008, this Court suspended
    respondent for one year based upon his January 2008 suspension in
    Missouri (52 AD3d 1112 [2008]). Thereafter, by order entered May
    5, 2011, this Court denied respondent's application for
    reinstatement, concluding that he had yet to remedy the issues
    that led to his suspension in Missouri (84 AD3d 1499 [2011]).
    Respondent was reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri in
    August 2015. Now, by application sworn to on September 26, 2015,
    -2-                  D-26-16
    respondent has reapplied for reinstatement to the practice of law
    in this state. Following an investigation, petitioner advises
    that it opposes respondent's application.
    Upon review of the submissions and consideration of all the
    circumstances in the record before us, we conclude that
    respondent has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he
    possesses the character and general fitness to resume the
    practice of law (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] §
    806.12 [b]). Accordingly, we deny his current application for
    reinstatement.
    Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ.,
    concur.
    ORDERED that respondent's application for reinstatement is
    denied.
    ENTER:
    Robert D. Mayberger
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D-26-16

Judges: Lahtinen, McCarthy, Rose, Devine, Aarons

Filed Date: 4/21/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2024