Matter of Robbins ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                           State of New York
    Supreme Court, Appellate Division
    Third Judicial Department
    Decided and Entered: May 5, 2016                       D-27-16
    ___________________________________
    In the Matter of SEAN ROBBINS,
    a Suspended Attorney.
    COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL
    STANDARDS,                               MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    Petitioner;
    SEAN ROBBINS,
    Respondent.
    (Attorney 
    Registration No. 4573697
    )
    ___________________________________
    Calendar Date:   April 25, 2016
    Before:   Egan Jr., J.P., Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ.
    __________
    Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,
    Albany, for petitioner.
    Law Offices of Richard E. Grayson, White Plains (Richard E.
    Grayson of counsel), for respondent.
    __________
    Per Curiam.
    Respondent was admitted to practice in Massachusetts in
    2001 and in New York by this Court in 2008. Respondent currently
    resides in the City of White Plains, Westchester County.
    By decision entered April 9, 2009, this Court suspended
    respondent from the practice of law for a period of nine months
    based upon his prior nine-month suspension by the Supreme
    Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts (61 AD3d 1177
    [2009]). Respondent has since been reinstated to the practice of
    law in Massachusetts. Respondent now applies for reinstatement
    in New York. While petitioner initially opposed the application,
    we note that this Court's Committee on Character and Fitness has
    -2-                  D-27-16
    submitted a favorable report (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22
    NYCRR] § 806.12 [b]).
    Our examination of the papers submitted on the application
    indicates that respondent has made all proper disclosures and has
    complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with
    this Court's rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys
    (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9). We are also
    satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of
    this Court's rules regarding reinstatement (see Rules of App Div,
    3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.12 [b]), and that he possesses the
    character and general fitness to resume the practice of law in
    this state.
    Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is
    reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.
    Egan Jr., J.P., Rose, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.
    ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is
    further
    ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and
    counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
    ENTER:
    Robert D. Mayberger
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D-27-16

Judges: Egan, Rose, Lynch, Devine

Filed Date: 5/5/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2024