People v. Childress ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • People v Childress (2017 NY Slip Op 04135)
    People v Childress
    2017 NY Slip Op 04135
    Decided on May 24, 2017
    Appellate Division, Second Department
    Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
    This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


    Decided on May 24, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
    WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
    SANDRA L. SGROI
    HECTOR D. LASALLE
    FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

    2015-03381
    (Ind. No. 1807/14)

    [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

    v

    Roshawn Childress, appellant.




    Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Kirk R. Brandt of counsel), for appellant.

    Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.



    DECISION & ORDER

    Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Camacho, J.), rendered March 26, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

    ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

    Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant's guilt of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (see Penal Law §§ 165.40, 165.45[4]; People v Cintron, 95 NY2d 329; People v Zorcik, 67 NY2d 670; People v Carter, 19 NY2d 967; People v Brown, 75 AD3d 515; People v Holder, 189 AD2d 783; People v Supino, 64 AD2d 720). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]).

    The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

    MASTRO, J.P., SGROI, LASALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

    ENTER:

    Aprilanne Agostino

    Clerk of the Court



Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-03381

Judges: Mastro, Sgroi, Lasalle, Connolly

Filed Date: 5/24/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/1/2024