Conyngham v. Haffen , 110 A.D. 866 ( 1905 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam:

    The judgment appealed from should be modified by affirming the same as to the defense designated in the answer as-,“a separate answer' and defense;.” and by reversing the:judginent and sustaining the demurrer,■ with costs, with leave to the defendant to amend on payment of costs in the court below, as to the defense designated in the answer as “a further defense-..”' As so modified judgment should ’be affirmed, without costs Of appeal to either *867party. Present — O’Brien, P. J., Patterson, McLaughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 110 A.D. 866

Filed Date: 12/15/1905

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/26/2024