Rogan v. Metropolitan Savings Bank , 139 A.D. 929 ( 1910 )

Per Curiam:

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500). Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of Totten (179 N. Y. 112) and Matter of United States Trust Co. (117 App. Div. 178; affd. on opinion of Scott, J., 189 N. Y. 500).