-
Scott, J.: I agree that there was error committed in the particulars pointed out by Mr. Justice Laughlin ; but that error went only to the measure of damages and in view of the nature of the article and the amount of the verdict, I do not think it. can fairly be said that it really increased the damages; since the article was one as to which the jury would have been justified in awarding a sum equal to the verdict without including punitive damages.
. I think, therefore, that the error was one which we can
*90 overlook and that the judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.Miller and Dowling, JJ., concurred; Ingraham, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissented.
Document Info
Judges: Ingraham, Laughlin, Scott
Filed Date: 12/29/1911
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024