Lorch v. Lorch ( 1900 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We think the questions of fact in this case were proper for the jury, and their verdict is not against the weight of evidence; but in view of the occurrences on the trial, and the charge of the court in relation thereto, we think the ends of justice require that there should be a new trial.

    The order appealed from is therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, .with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

    VAN BRUNT, P. J., dissenting.

Document Info

Filed Date: 3/9/1900

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024