Burton v. W. Burton & Co. ( 1915 )

PER CURIAM.

We think that the finding of tbe j¡íry that there was a delivery of this stock by the defendant Burton to the plaintiff was acainst the weight of evidence. The judgment and order are therefore reversed, and a new ttfirJ ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event. Order filed.

LAUGHLIN and SCOTT, JJ., dissent, and vote for affirmance.