Vio Chemical Co. v. Hartman ( 1908 )

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove the cause of action alleged; that the daughter was the agent of the defendant in the execution of the papers, and that there was no proof of partnership between the daughter and the mother. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant, by failure to plead copartnership or joint liability, waived the same.