Zanner v. Lipkoff ( 1926 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    In opposition to the former motion the appellants submitted among other papers a decision of the Board rescinding a former award, which we construed as meaning the award from which the appeal was taken. It now appears that the award so rescinded was probably a former award to a doctor, which award is unrelated to this appeal.- A reargument of the motion is, therefore, granted. Motion for reargument granted.

Document Info

Filed Date: 5/15/1926

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2024