Caspersen v. La Sala Bros. ( 1926 )

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for a preference reversed on the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. This motion and a prior one were denied solely on the ground of laches. We do not think that the facts shown in this case disclose sufficient serious delay to constitute laches preventing the granting of the preference. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.