Senn v. Welch ( 1927 )

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that while the exclusion of defendant’s statement that he had no knowledge of the frozen condition of the plumbing was error, his testimony as a whole made his claim in that regard clearly manifest so that no harm followed. The verdict is based on a fair conflict of evidence and should not under such circumstances be disturbed. All concur. Present — Hubbs, P. J., Clark, Sears, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.