Howard v. Cotter ( 1934 )

Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion granted restraining the defendants from using the word “ regular.” In our opinion the use of the word “ regular ” by these defendants tends to mislead the primary electors as to the status of the defendants. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.