Remsen v. Hyams ( 1902 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We think that the case of Hahl v. Sugo, 169 N. Y. 116, 62 N. E. 135, is an express authority for the granting of this motion. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/7/1902

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024