Messina v. Estate of Messina ( 1936 )


Menu:
  • In the action for the foreclosure of a third mortgage, order in so far as the same denies the motion of defendants Cash and Canavespi to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for lack of prosecution, on the ground that younger issues have been disposed of in their regular order, affirmed, *783with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Filed Date: 6/15/1936

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/27/2024