-
Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered. Defendants should have been permitted to offer testimony in support of their claim that the company was covered by an oral binder. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 249 A.D. 607, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5165, 291 N.Y.S. 789
Filed Date: 11/13/1936
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/27/2024