Southworth v. County of Oswego ( 1937 )

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We put our affirmance on the broad principle that when the county became responsible for the maintenance of this road after its improvement, its responsibility included the entire width of the highway and the sidewalk as existing. AJI concur. (The order denies a motion to dismiss the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.