Harvey v. Bell Syndicate, Inc. ( 1938 )

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial, on the ground that parol evidence was admissible to explain the meaning of the term “ extension or renewal of same ” in the contract in suit.