Morel v. Hanson ( 1940 )

Orders unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. In view of the equivocal character of the allegations of the complaints, we think that the defense of the Statute of Frauds should remain in the answers against any possible contingency arising on the trial. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.