Piscopo v. National Dry Dock & Repair Co. ( 1925 )

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The technical error in charging the comparative negligence rule was harmless, as there was no evidence upon which a finding of contributory negligence could have been based. (Amato v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co., 209 App. Div. 882.) Present—Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.