Rogers v. Village of Port Chester ( 1921 )

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the preliminary notice was sufficient under the authority of Sheehy v. City of New York (160 N. Y. 139) and Sweeney v. City of New York (225 id. 271). Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concur.