-
Dowling, J. (dissenting): I dissent upon the ground that there was a valid outstanding agreement of separation between the parties, under which the plaintiff had received and still retains property belonging to the defendant; that said agreement was never canceled or repudiated by the defendant, but he simply failed to make payments thereunder for a period of time, and that plaintiff is in no position to claim that the agreement can be repudiated by
*760 her until she has tendered back the property received by her thereunder. With such a valid outstanding separation agreement between the parties, there can be no action brought for a separation. (Randolph v. Field, 165 App. Div. 282.)Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 172 A.D. 758, 159 N.Y.S. 230, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6537
Judges: Clarke, Dowling, Scott
Filed Date: 5/26/1916
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/12/2024