Landes v. Landes , 159 N.Y.S. 230 ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • Dowling, J. (dissenting):

    I dissent upon the ground that there was a valid outstanding agreement of separation between the parties, under which the plaintiff had received and still retains property belonging to the defendant; that said agreement was never canceled or repudiated by the defendant, but he simply failed to make payments thereunder for a period of time, and that plaintiff is in no position to claim that the agreement can be repudiated by *760her until she has tendered back the property received by her thereunder. With such a valid outstanding separation agreement between the parties, there can be no action brought for a separation. (Randolph v. Field, 165 App. Div. 282.)

    Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 172 A.D. 758, 159 N.Y.S. 230, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6537

Judges: Clarke, Dowling, Scott

Filed Date: 5/26/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024