Peterson v. McAllister , 236 A.D. 809 ( 1932 )

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The record on the present appeal fully supports the findings and conclusions that plaintiff did not have an easement over the property of the defendants but merely possessed a revocable license which the defendants had a right to and did revoke. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.