Bird v. International Railway Co. , 156 N.Y.S. 1116 ( 1915 )


Menu:
  • —Judg*974ment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Footé, J., who dissented upon the ground that the court erred in charging the jury that the defendant was called upon to have the car approach the usual stopping place under control.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 171 A.D. 973, 156 N.Y.S. 1116

Filed Date: 12/15/1915

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024