GEBREYESUS, AWET, PEOPLE v ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1228
    KA 13-01487
    PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
    V                              MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    AWET GEBREYESUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF
    COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
    FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah
    A. Haendiges, J.), rendered June 3, 2013. The judgment convicted
    defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second
    degree.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed.
    Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his
    guilty plea of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§
    110.00, 125.25 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right
    to appeal is invalid. We reject that contention. The record
    establishes that defendant waived his right to appeal as a condition
    of a negotiated plea bargain and sentence (see People v Mercedes, 171
    AD2d 1044, 1044, lv denied 77 NY2d 998). To the extent that defendant
    contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid because the
    court did not conduct an “in-depth examination . . . concerning the
    potential language barriers,” we note that an interpreter was present
    and assisted defendant throughout the plea and sentencing proceedings
    (see id.; see also People v Rosa-Sanchez, 267 AD2d 981, 981, lv denied
    95 NY2d 938). Moreover, the record establishes that defendant
    reviewed the written waiver of the right to appeal with his attorney,
    stated that he understood it completely, and had no questions for the
    court with respect to it. Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal
    forecloses review of defendant’s remaining contentions, and we
    therefore do not reach them (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248,
    255).
    Entered:    November 20, 2015                      Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KA 13-01487

Filed Date: 11/20/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/7/2016