Murray v. Neal ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find no errors of law or fact in this case. Claims such as plaintiff’s are always subject to the closest scrutiny, but, from the whole record, we gain the impression that the plaintiff made out a meritorious case and that the award was reasonable in amount. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff on a claim against an estate for care furnished decedent.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Document Info

Filed Date: 1/5/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2024