PHELPS, CINDY M. v. HUNTER, EUGENE DEXTER ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •            SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
    1410
    CAF 11-02240
    PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
    IN THE MATTER OF CINDY M. PHELPS AND AUGUSTUS T.
    PHELPS, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
    V                               MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
    EUGENE DEXTER HUNTER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF
    COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
    ROBERT F. RHINEHART, SYRACUSE, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.
    KAREN J. DOCTER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAYETTEVILLE, FOR SHAKIR E.H.
    Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County
    (Salvatore Pavone, R.), entered October 7, 2011 in a proceeding
    pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other
    things, awarded sole legal and physical custody of the subject child
    to petitioners.
    It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is
    unanimously affirmed without costs.
    Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order granting the
    nonparent petitioners sole legal and physical custody of the father’s
    minor child. We affirm for reasons stated in the amended findings of
    fact and decision at Family Court. We add only that there is no merit
    to the father’s contention that the Court Attorney Referee lacked
    jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter (see generally CPLR 4317
    [a]). The father signed the requisite consent and, although he signed
    that consent before being informed of his right to counsel pursuant to
    Family Court Act § 262 (a), he and his attorney willingly participated
    in the subsequent proceedings without objection and with the full
    knowledge that the Court Attorney Referee would adjudicate the merits
    of the petition (see Matter of Carlos G. [Bernadette M.], 96 AD3d 632,
    633; 1199 Hous. Corp. v Jimco Restoration Corp., 77 AD3d 502, 502;
    Dodge v Lynch, 55 AD3d 314, 315, lv denied 11 NY3d 713; cf. Matter of
    Gale v Gale, 87 AD3d 1011, 1012; Matter of Osmundson v Held-Cummings,
    306 AD2d 950, 950-951).
    Entered:   December 21, 2012                       Frances E. Cafarell
    Clerk of the Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAF 11-02240

Filed Date: 12/21/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021