Tack v. Columbia Fire Insurance Co. of Dayton ( 1940 )


Menu:
  • In an action for reformation of a fire insurance policy, and for judgment in accordance with the terms of the policy, as so reformed, for a loss sustained by fire, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/12/1940

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2024