Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson) ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson) (2024 NY Slip Op 02246)
    Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Nelson)
    2024 NY Slip Op 02246
    Decided on April 25, 2024
    Appellate Division, Third Department
    Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
    This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


    Decided and Entered:April 25, 2024

    PM-72-24

    [*1]In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Petitioner; Sabrina Alyce Nelson, Respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 2793099.)


    Calendar Date:March 11, 2024
    Before:Pritzker, J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.

    Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

    Sabrina Alyce Nelson, Washington, DC, respondent pro se.



    Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1743 [3d Dept 2019]; see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

    Upon reading respondent's affidavit with exhibits sworn to February 5, 2024, and the March 4, 2024 correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has satisfied the requirements of Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.16 (c) (5); (2) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (3) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (4) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [a]), it is

    ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

    ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately.

    Pritzker, J.P., Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.



Document Info

Docket Number: PM-72-24

Filed Date: 4/25/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/26/2024