Sulil Realty Corp. v. Rye Motors, Inc. , 262 N.Y.S.2d 989 ( 1965 )

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed, without costs on the sole ground that title to the property in question was in the respondent, and not in the defendant, at the time the restraining notice was served.

Concur — Martuscbllo, Hogan and Ritchie, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.