200 Prince Realty v. Greenberg , 134 Misc. 2d 21 ( 1986 )

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered October 10, 1985 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated in that part of the opinion below which holds that respondent Greenberg is entitled to a renewal lease because petitioner’s predecessor knowingly and voluntarily accepted respondent as a successor rent-stabilized tenant in the subject premises.

Hughes, P. J., Riccobono and Parness, JJ., concur.